Meeting:

 

Faculty Senate Meeting, 12 October 2005, Wooten Hall Room 322

 

Absent:

 

Gopal, Grable, Hill, Levin, Pirtle

 

Guests:

 

Miguel Blanca, Student; Gene Wright, Faculty Ombudsman; Doina Farkas, Professor; Emily Hughes, Visitor; Jamaal O’Neal, NT Daily; Matt Zabel, Denton Record-Chronicle; John Price, Vice Provost, UNT Dallas Campus; Andrea Patrick, UNT Bookstore; Robney Davison, UNT Bookstore; Randy Guttery, UNT Bookstore; Chris Klement, SGA; Celia Williamson, Special Assistant to the Provost; Howard Johnson, Provost; David Hall, SGA President; Kay Selby, Director, Academic Publications; Brian Weinberg, SGA; Elizabeth Murphy, SGA; Haj Ross, Professor; Dan Peak, Professor; Terrance Pohlen, Professor; Mary Thibodeaux, Associate Dean, COBA; Michael Drought, Interim Dean, SOVA; Michelle Hale, InHouse Editor; Paul Dworak, Office of Compliance

 

Opening:

 

Frances van Tassell, Chair of the Faculty Senate, called the meeting to order at 2:05 PM

 

 

Introduction of new senators:  Senator van Tassell introduced:  Rebecca Glover, Counseling, Development and Higher Education, Group VI; James Swan, Gerontology, Group VII, and; Russell Elleven, Technology and Cognition, At-Large Assistant Professors.  Additionally, Robert Pirtle, Biology, has accepted a one-year temporary term to serve in Marry Harris’ seat while she serves as interim chair.

 

Announcement: Senator van Tassell announced that Sue Young, Faculty Senate Administrative Assistant, has announced her resignation.  The senators gratefully acknowledged her service to the Senate.

 

Special Presentations of Certificates to Interim Deans:

Michael Drought, Interim Dean, School of Visual Arts

Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean, School of Library and Information Sciences

Mary Thibodeaux, Interim Dean, College of Business Administration

 

Presentation by John Price, UNT Dallas Campus Vice Provost: Dr. Price’s PowerPoint[V1]  presentation will be available at www.unt.edu/unt-dallas/UNTAcademicPlan_Web.pdf. Several important points in addition to the presentation were addressed by Dr. Price. (1) The state legislature will designate the University of North Texas at Dallas when enrollment at the UNT-Dallas Campus reaches 1,000 FTE. (2) UNT-Dallas’ computing needs will be supported by UNT-Denton’s academic computing during the first five years via overhead return from Dallas to Denton. (3) Eighteen new faculty lines in Denton have been designated as contract[V2]  lines for UNT-Dallas.  When the campus becomes UNT at Dallas, Dallas will be able to hire their own faculty. (4) UNT-Dallas’ library needs will be supported by UNT-Denton libraries during the first five years.

 

Approval of Minutes:  The minutes of the 14 September 2005 meeting were presented.  Upon motion by Senator Coy, the minutes were approved as corrected (Senator Johnston’s name was misspelled).

 

Comments by Senate Chair:  Senator van Tassell thanked all senators for their hard work and stressed that all senators must follow the policies and procedures of the Faculty Senate as set out in the Charter and Bylaws.

 

Committee Reports:

 

A.  Committee on Committees: Senator Thomsett-Scott asked for approval of write-in candidates for committee nominations. Point of Order was called by Senator Booth: How can the Committee on Committees be operating since the Committee on Committees has not yet been formulated? (The Senate Bylaws state that the term of each member of the Committee on Committees shall be from the September to the beginning of the following September meeting.)  Senator van Tassell indicated that traditionally the Faculty Senate Executive Committee provides the charges to the Committee on Committees in the late spring semester so that senate subcommittee memberships can proceed in a timely fashion. Senator Booth pointed out that this process was not provided for in the bylaws, and asked if the Charter and Bylaws Committee could consider the process and assure that the actions of the Executive Committee were appropriately linked to the bylaws.

 

Motion by Senator Pelton:

“Approve write-in candidates as nominated by the Committee on Committees.”

Motion passed unanimously.

 

B.  Fine Arts Committee:  The “UNT Fine Arts Series Status Report” was presented as a motion and approved unanimously.

 

C.  University Tenure Committee:  Dr. Gus Seligmann distributed copies of the “2005 Report of the UTC to the Faculty Senate”, summarizing the 2004-2005 activities of the UTC.  Dr. Seligmann addressed several questions[V3] . (1) The UTC maintains its authority to base its decisions on both substantive and procedural issues. (2) In each of the tenure denial hearings conducted by the UTC during 2004/2005: (a) Dr. Seligmann characterized the procedural flaws as serious; (b) except for a single reviewing individual in one of the five appeals cases, all recommendations forwarded to the Provost were unanimously positive for tenure; and (c) while outside letters were not as clear cut, none of the external letters could be considered clearly negative.

 

Motion by Senator Turner:

“The Senate recognizes the receipt of the report of the committee.”

Motion passed unanimously.

 

Motion by Senator (name of Senator was not noted for the minutes):
The Faculty Senate Charter and Bylaws should be modified such that the University Tenure Committee reports annually to the Senate.”

Motion passed unanimously.

 

D.  Charter and Bylaws Committee:

      Point of Order was called by Senator Mueller: Has the committee resolved the wording of the resolutions proposing amending the Faculty Senate Charter and Bylaws to alter the method of electing officers and removing officers? Has the committee met to discuss the wording or to elect a Chair?  [V4] Senator Barton indicated that he was Chair last year, and the Charter and Bylaws Committee has traditionally kept the past Chair until a new Chair was elected, and that the Committee received[V5]  the resolutions by email.

 

Motion by Senator Mueller:

“Remand the issue of these resolutions until the committee meets to elect a chair and discuss the issues.”

Motion passed 27 for, 4 against, 1 abstention.

 

Unfinished Business:

A.  University Writing Committee: The “Report to the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate – University Writing Committee Report 2005” was presented as a motion by Senator Barton.  Senator Coy questioned the differential amounts of the awards for graduate and undergraduate students and Senator Barton responded that amounts had been pre-determined outside the committee.   Motion was approved unanimously.

 

Motion by Senator Turner:

“The University Writing Committee should review the policy that awards differing amounts to graduate and undergraduate students.”

Motion passed unanimously.

B. Curriculum Committee: The “University Curriculum Committee Report” was presented as a motion and approved unanimously.

 

C. Plus/Minus Grading: Senator van Tassell indicated that there was still time to make catalog changes dealing with the issue (to implement or not to implement).  David Hall, Student Government Association President indicated that there were multiple SGA resolutions opposing the plus/minus system, that ballots cast indicated opposition to plus/minus grading, that 3,476 signatures expressing concern about plus/minus grading have been submitted, that there were many misconceptions about the advantages and disadvantages of plus/minus grading, and that any major change must have “buy-in” from the majority.  Mr. Hall said that the majority buy-in was lacking, and asked the Senate to reconsider the implementation of plus/minus grading.  Senator van Tassell indicated that the Dean’s Council supported the SGA request.  Senator Turner asked for point of clarification: Was the plus/minus system that the Senate voted to approve in 2002 and scheduled for implementation in the EIS system in 2004 still not implemented?  Senator van Tassell indicated that the implementation had been delayed pending software modifications to allow plus/minus grading, but now the EIS system is ready.

 

Motion by Senator Staff:

“Suspend implementation of the Plus/Minus grading system and refer the issue back to the Academic Affairs Committee for reconsideration based upon the new information provided by the SGA.”

 

Senator Sahliyeh encouraged the SGA to endorse the Plus/Minus grading system.

 

Senator Goggin: Call for Previous Question.

 

Motion passed 26 for, 7 against.

 

D. Library Budget Resolution:

 

Motion by Senator McPherson:

“Accept the resolution.”

Motion passed unanimously.

 

New Business:

A.  Resolution in Support of the Faculty Senate at Texas A&M Kingsville:

 

Motion by Senator Swan:

“Accept the resolution.”

Call for Quorum showed 32 senators present (31 needed for quorum).

Motion passed unanimously.                

 

B.  Request to release election vote counts: Senator Miles indicated that there had been a request to release the vote counts for the faculty candidates for the pending Presidential Search Committee.

 

Motion by Senator Booth with friendly amendment accepted:

“Be it resolved that all faculty election vote counts be published to the faculty via the Faculty Senate web page.”

Motion passed 29 for, 2 against, 1 abstention.

 

Report of the Office of the Provost/VPPA Howard Johnson:

Provost Johnson’s PowerPoint presentation will be available on the Faculty Senate web page.  Dr. Johnson highlighted several points. (1) Excellence and market adjustments for faculty salaries are intended to recognize, reward and retain core faculty. (2) He will continue to seek additional funds next year for market adjustments. (3) This year monies for salary adjustments are available for an average 1% merit increase, an average 1% excellence increase, and a[V6]  market adjustment of just over one million dollars. (4) Compensation rates for summer teaching are still under consideration; if a decision is not made in sufficient time, last year’s rates will be used for next summer.

Faculty Senate Vice Chair’s Update:

Senator Miles’ PowerPoint presentation will be available on the Faculty Senate web page.  Senator Miles summarized the discussions the Faculty Senate Executive Committee had with President Pohl on: (1) the university’s master plan; (2) the status of the University Planning Council; (3) the status of the university’s Strategic Plan, and; (4) this year’s merit/excellence/market raises.  Senator Miles also summarized the discussion the Faculty Senate Executive Committee had with Vice Provost Suzanne LaBrecque on: (1) faculty raises; (2) summer teaching; (3) the status of the ongoing searches for Deans; and (4) how the goal to increase student enrollment may have unintended consequences.

 

Faculty Senate Chair’s Update:

Senator van Tassell’s PowerPoint presentation will be available on the Faculty Senate web page.  Due to the late hour, Senator van Tassell suggested that everyone look at her presentation and send her comments or questions.

 

Committee of the Whole:

no actions

 

Group Caucuses:

Groups I, II, VI, and VII need to select Committee on Committees representatives.

Groups III and VI need to select Executive Committee representatives.

 

Senate adjourned at 4:45 PM.

 

Respectively submitted by Sam Atkinson

 


 [V1]PowerPoint is a proper noun. J

 [V2]Are you sure that 18 lines are contract? Dr. Price mentioned a total number of lines, of which some are contract. We should report all the lines, not just those targeted for contract.

 [V3]Dr. Seligman addressed questions but he did not discuss the report.

 [V4]Let’s use the term “past” rather than “old.”

 [V5]According to members of the committee, the email was for members to consider the resolutions, not discuss them.

 [V6]I believe the market adjustment amount is just over 1 million dollars. I am not sure that constitutes a 1%.