Administrative Effectiveness Survey 2007-2008
Evaluation of the Dean of UNT Libraries: Dr. Donald Grose

 

 

The following averages were calculated using a 5 point scale.
The faculty were asked to answer each question using the following :

 

Excellent = 5 pts.
Good = 4 pts.
Satisfactory = 3 pts.
Unsatisfactory = 2 pts.
Failing = 1 point

 

Total number of faculty responses = 119
Total number of eligible respondents = 793

 

% left blank Avg
1. Resource management 14.3 3.99
2. Management of library operations so that programs, departments and colleges/schools can improve the quality of academic operations and outcomes 13.4 3.97
3. Effectiveness of work with deans, department chairs and faculty to maintain the quality of the library and library services 24.4 3.93
4. Fair treatment of people 33.6 3.89
5. Trustworthiness 32.8 3.83
6. Accessibility 30.3 3.76
7. Work in boosting morale within the library 45.4 3.37
8. Promotion for improvements of library services 30.3 3.8
9. Representation of library needs and opportunities to administration 39.5 3.65
10. Promotion of the interests of the library in the community/region 43.7 3.49
11. Vision for the library services at UNT 35.3 3.66
12. Leadership for the library staff 43.7 3.52
13. Creation of an environment for the provision and operation of quality library services at UNT 27.7 3.9
14. Overall effectiveness as the Dean of Libraries 24.4 3.68