University Student Survey, Spring 2000

Executive Summary

A survey was administered to both undergraduate and graduate students in spring 2000. The final instrument incorporated the suggestions from the vice presidents, deans, a librarian and others of the University community. The comprehensive survey contained 240 items. Students were also invited to write comments and suggestions in response to the question "How can UNT be a better place for you?" Results are reported separately.

bullets_squares_pp_005.gif (86 bytes) The Sample
bullets_squares_pp_005.gif (86 bytes) Data Analysis
bullets_squares_pp_005.gif (86 bytes) Legislation Items. Customer Service Items Assessment
bullets_squares_pp_005.gif (86 bytes) Comments Offered by the Student Respondents

The Sample. There were 60 course sections invited to participate in this survey. These courses were chosen to reflect a stratified sample of the current student body. Many of the packets returned without the original labeling so it is not possible to calculate a response rate from the course sections. However, the number of surveys mailed out in packets totaled 3,240. The sample, that is the total number returned, was 1,452. A comparison of the sample to the actual enrollment provides evidence that the sample is representative of the enrollment in terms of student classification (when aggregated freshman/sophomore junior/senior and graduate as used in determining the sample), school/college of major, ethnicity, and age distribution. Male students are slightly underrepresented in this sample (40% sample, 45% university).

arrows_rm_002.gif (532 bytes)

Data analysis. For data analysis the students were aggregated into three classification groups: freshman/sophomore, junior/senior, and graduate. There were 168 students that did not indicate a classification. They are not included in this analysis. For some items one response option was "no opinion or not applicable." When the percentage of those expressing no opinion exceeded one-third of respondents, the percentages were recalculated and reported for only those expressing an opinion.

arrows_rm_002.gif (532 bytes)

Legislation items. Customer Service Items Assessment. All percentages are the total of "satisfied" or "very satisfied" responses among those expressing an opinion.

arrows_rm_002.gif (532 bytes)

Comments Offered by the Student Respondents. Students were invited to write comments and suggestions about "How can UNT be a better place for you?" There are recurring themes such as parking and tuition costs. Some comments were unique. Some students expressed one view ("more support for the Greek system") while others expressed an opposite view ("eliminate frats/sororities"). Examples from the comments follow.

arrows_rm_002.gif (532 bytes)


Back
Institutional Research and Accreditation