|
Quick Facts: ♦ UNT has been
conducting the Institutional Staff Survey since 1997. The Spring 2004 survey
was the third time the staff survey has been conducted. |
Eagle Research Outlook INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & ACCREDITATION |
||||
|
♦ Seventy-three
percent of the respondents are Female and 26% |
UNT STAFF SURVEY 2004 |
||||
|
are male. ♦ Nearly 90% of
respondents agree that the Human Resources Newsletter is a good communi- cation tool. ♦ More than 42% of
respondents believed their work place to be overly stressful. ♦ Supervisors indicted
stronger stress level than non-supervisors. |
Background: In the spring of 1997, institutional surveys for
faculty and staff were developed and administered by University Planning at
the Respondents: The Office of Institutional Research and Accreditation
(formally University Planning) sent the Spring 2004 Staff Surveys to 2,208
benefits eligible staff and administrators through campus mail in May
2004. By the end of July 2004, 674
surveys were returned (a 30% return rate).
The above table compares the 2004 Staff Survey participants to the
benefit eligible employees at UNT in fall 2003. |
||||
|
♦ Heavy workload,
relationship with supervisor, balancing work and family obligations, and mundane
tasks were the leading sources of work stress. ♦ Taking regular
breaks, walking, and listening or playing music were the leading ways to
control work stress. Highlights: Working Environment Page
2 Work and Stress 3 |
UNT
Staff: Distributions by Job Category and Gender (Fall
2003 and Spring 2004) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Job
Category Spring 2004
Staff Fall 2004 Survey Survey ----------------------------------------------------------------- Administrative
106
17% 137 6% Professional 252
40% 759
34% Clerical 115 19% 473
21% Service/Maint. 46
7% 504
23% Technical 40
6% 364
16% Gender
: Female 463 73%
1276
58% Male 168 26% 928
42% Race: White
534 85% 1586
71% African
Amer. 20 3%
246
11% Asian
8 1%
79 4% Hispanic 25 4%
240
11% Other 1 1% 56
3% Source:*UNT Workforce Statistics for the month of November 2003, HR Department, Records. |
||||
|
Controlling Work Stress 3 |
HOW WERE THE
SURVEYS ADMINISTERED? |
||||
|
Balancing Work & Family 4 Summary 4 |
In May 2004, staff surveys were sent by campus mail to
2,208 benefits eligible administrators and staff. As an incentive to participate in the
survey, three prizes for drawings were donated by the university community (Avesta, UNT
Athletics, and The Club at This year’s prize winners were: John Benson, Internal Audit CONGRATULATIONS!!!!! Benito Salazar, Custodial Services
Thelma L.
Johnson, Custodial Services |
|
|
WORKING ENVIRONMENT |
|
Overall, approximately 81% of the respondents felt
that they were a real part of the university community. However nearly one-third of the |
The first questions in the
survey addressed issues related to the working environment of UNT staff. In
the following questions (Q, 6, 13, 19, 22), less than 60% gave a “Strongly
Agree/ Agree” response. Further, 53% of respondents from the 2004 Survey
agreed that Adequate opportunities exist for transfer to other positions at
UNT. Approximately 50% of the respondents perceived UNT as a stressful place
to work in 2002. When question 25 was rephrased as: I find the workplace to be overly stressful in 2004, 42.5%
agreed with the statement.
|
|
service and maintenance staff members did not feel a
strong sense of belonging to the UNT
Community. |
2004
Staff 2002 Staff 1997 Staff Survey Survey Survey Question (Strongly
(Strongly (Strongly Agree Agree Agree
/Agree /Agree /Agree
|
|
How the results differ from 2002 to 2004? ♦ In 2004, fewer
respondents saw an opportunity for professional growth, promotion, and office
transfer. |
6. Adequate opportunities
exist for promotion at UNT 43.3% 52.2% 55.5% 13. The basis for
determining salary increases at 44.5% 38.4% 34.8% 19. There is adequate
parking for staff 33.7%
36.4% N/A 22. My department
head/director involves staff 58.1% 56.7% N/A 25.I find the workplace to
be stressful 42.5% 49.3% N/A
|
|
♦ More respondents
agreed the basis for determining salary increases in fair at UNT in 2004. ♦ Respondents felt
fewer opportunities are available to provide their input to decision making
processes in 2004. |
The survey respondents gave
one of the lowest agreement ratings to the statement: the basis for
determining salary increases at UNT is fair. Only 44.5% of the respondents
agreed with the current condition for determining salary increases. In
particular, technical support staff expressed their concerns for the
determinants of salary increases (17.5% agreement rate). Responses from
minority staff members, including American Indian/Ntive
Alasken, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and
non-Resident showed low agreement rates (less than 37.5%). African American
staff members, however, indicated the highest agreement rate (47.4%) among
all minority staff members. The result of the African American staff members
was contrary to the finding from the 2002 Staff Survey. Further, the finding from
the 2002 Staff Survey indicated that the overall agreement rate for the
fairness of the determinants of salary increases was 38.4%. With regard to a
level of satisfaction for the employee benefits, over 68% the 2004 survey
respondents agreed that their insurance and benefits are adequate while 85.3%
of the respondents agreed in 2002.
|
|
|
With regard to perceptions
of staff members toward their work environment, survey results indicated that
the staff members perceive UNT as a hospitable (67.4%) and pleasant (67.3%)
place to work. Similar results were found in the 1997 and 2002 Staff Surveys.
Further, a majority of the respondents see UNT as a bureaucratic work
environment. In 2002, 64.9% of the respondents agreed that the university is
committed to making changes to improve working conditions. In the 2004 Staff
Survey, the agreement level for this statement slightly decreased to 61.1%.
Furthermore, there was a slight decrease in the number of respondents (73.8%)
in 2004 who believed that the university is interested in the welfare of staff than in 2002
(74.5%). |
|
WORK AND STRESS Since
2002, Several questions related to work stress have been included in the
Staff Survey. In 2002, nearly 50% of the respondents agreed that their
workplace was stressful. Similar responses were found across all departments,
programs, and position classifications. The respondents with supervisory
responsibility indicated stronger stress level (52%) that the respondents
without such responsibility (43%). Thirty-nine percent of the supervisors
said the stress was associated with their heavy workload. The technical
support staff reported the least stress level (35.4%). In
2004, question 25 was rephrased as; I find my workplace to be overly
stressful. Overall, 42.5% of the respondents agreed with the statement. The
respondents with supervisory responsibility indicated stronger stress level
(45.3%) than the respondents without such responsibility (38.6%). Examining
responses by position classifications, Administrators/Executives,
Professional Staff, and Service Maintenance Staff showed higher stress levels
(40%, 44%, and 42.9% respectively). There was no gender difference in the
stress level. The following table indicates the list of reasons
that make the respondents’ work stressful. Heavy workload and relationship
with supervisor were listed as the leading sources for work stress. Question
2004 Survey 2002
Survey Heavy Workload 27% 31% Relationship with
supervisor
13% 17% Relationship with higher
administration 9% 14% Relationship with
co-worker
8% 12% Balancing work and family
obligations
11%
12% Inflexible policies and
procedures 9% 11% Mundane task
11%
11% Meetings
8% 9% Completing reports
7% 8% Not
allowed to take off earned time 7% 8% |
|||
|
Considering how staff deal
with or minimize stress in their work environment, the two favorable ways to
reduce their stress were “taking regular breaks” (42%) and “listening or
playing music” (42%). This finding was identical to the responses found in
the 2002 Staff Survey. The results from both 2002 and 2004 Staff Surveys
indicated that “participating in a stress management class” was the least
favorable way to deal with stress at work. Though less than 30% of the
respondents indicated participation in an exercise program as a way to
control their work stress, more staff members were satisfied with the
availability of facilities and equipment
for recreational and fitness programs at UNT as compared to the 2002
response.
|
|||
|
Institutional Research and Accreditation Administrative Building Room #121 Phone: (940) 565-2085 Fax: (940) 565-2774 Please visit our website: |
BALANCING WORK AND FAMILY Five options were listed in
the survey for staff to identify how the university could assist them in
balancing work and family obligations. The first choice was the option of
having flextime at work. Nearly 95% of the respondents indicated that
flextime would be beneficial and 79.4% liked the option of telecommuting.
Eighty-one percent of the respondents said that clearly stated department or
university policies on balancing work and family obligation would be helpful.
Seventy-five percent of the respondents indicated that they need more
accessible childcare on campus. Finally, alternative job arrangements such as
part-time employment and job sharing were recommended (62.5%). By
examining gender differences in the responses, female respondents expressed
higher desire to have flextime, the option of telecommuting, alternative job
responsibilities (part-time, job sharing), and accessible child care on
campus than the male respondents. Both female and male respondents equally
indicated that clearly stated department or university policy on balancing
work and family obligations would be helpful. |
||
|
Office of
Institutional Research
& Accreditation The office of Institutional
Research & Accreditation (IR&A) develops and maintains extensive data
bases, conducts detailed research and provides timely, accurate, and useful
data to address the needs of university decision-makers, external agencies, and
internal constituents. IR&A reports to the Provost and Vice President for
Academic Affairs and takes the lead role in responding to institutional
accreditation requirements and helping
university decision makers ensure that the principles for continued
accreditation with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools are met,
The office also provides guidance in the area of Institutional effectiveness to help improve the quality
of academic offerings, institutional operations and support, and student
services at the university in
accordance with the institution’s mission. |
The Results from the past
three Staff Surveys revealed that staff members of the ● The selected
findings highlighted the work stress issues as follows: ● More then 42% of
staff members felt their work place to be overly stressful. Staff members
with supervisory responsibility indicated stronger stress level than the
staff members without such responsibility. ● Heavy workload,
relationship with supervisor with supervisor, balancing work and family
obligations, and mundane tasks were listed as the leading sources of their
stress. ● It is assumed that
the sources of stress may have resulted from budget reductions and the
implementation of the new EIS systems. ● As solutions for
the above issues, the findings suggested that uses of flextime as well as an
option of telecommuting can be beneficial for the staff members to balance
their work and family obligations and to reduce their work stress. Overall, the survey results
revealed fair satisfaction with work assignments and work environment form
the survey respondents. When the respondents were asked to rate the service
quality of various departments at UNT, several departments received lower
satisfaction rate this year as compared to the 1997 and 2002 ratings. It is
assumed that the service productivity among those departments may have been
affected by the newly implemented EIS system at UNT. Further, negative
perceptions among some of the respondents toward the current institutional policies,
such as 1) documentation/evaluation of work performance; 2) reward system; 3)
opportunities for promotion and pay raises; and 4) balancing work and family
obligations, deserve further investigation by the administration. To view our complete UNT Staff Survey 2004 report,
please visit our web site: http://www.unt.edu/ir_acc |
||