University of North Texas Computing and Information Technology Center
Computing and Information Technology Center Home
Help Desk
Training
About Us
Publications
Our Mission

 


Research & Statistical Support


Under construction

The following is an admittedly biased list of what we feel are some benefits and issues seen with our more popular packages. It is based within the context of academic research and the typical needs of those who come to our office whose primary use of statistical software is scientific research.  It is not exhaustive, but may give some additional insight into what's available if you are wondering what to use.  There is a wealth of information on the web for all of the below packages for you to further use to make your decision.  Note that the best choice however, is to be flexible and hop around as your specific needs suit you.  At UNT, you have free access to all of these in one way or another.

Package Strengths Weaknesses
R Free (Open-Source) so not restricted to site licenses
Has kept up with the times with regard to methods appropriate to the academic researcher across a wide range of disciplines
Near-daily updates
Can teach/demonstrate statistical concepts with it (even has an add-on package devoted specifically to that)
Graphics capabilities practically unmatched
Extensive documentation, even free complete books on line
Easy to use menu system (as an addon) that has even advanced methods available
More difficult to learn than other stat programs, unless you already do real programming.
No real viable 'spreadsheet style' maneuverability within the data (though for analyzing parts of a dataset it is actually much easier than many gui-oriented products)
Summary:  There simply isn't much you can't do with R as an academic researcher, and while it can be difficult to learn, that will eventually turn into time saved had you tried to do similar things with other packages.  It is Mike and Rich's package of choice.
PASW Easy to use menu system  for basic analyses (going beyond the basics for most research needs  will typically require syntax or another package)
Until v. 16, very easy to move around within the data
Can get output easily and in easy to read format

Not geared specifically to academic research needs
Prohibitively expensive for students
Consistent license issues
New versions are not fully backwards compatible by design
For some disciplines' typical analyses, no significant updates in years
Not a true programming language
Lacks basic things like testing of assumptions, computing of some standard effect sizes etc.
Only a handful of 'official' statistic specifc macros available and most regarding analyses much better implemented in other packages (e.g. subset regression)
Typically released notably buggy
Base install is decades behind the times in most analyses often used such as regression, ANOVA, factor analysis
Few base offerings for dealing with problematic data
Terrible graphics
Cost
Summary: We don't feel PASW has academic research needs first and foremost anymore, and in general it makes doing good, modern data analysis (in that academic arena) difficult to go along with being cost prohibitive to students. The RSS groups further feels that release 16 was possibly their poorest effort ever. Its only advantage over other packages for years has been ease of use, and that has been dwindling rapidly as the other packages catch up.
SAS Powerful out of the box
Includes many modern techniques

Not geared specifically to academic research needs
Painful installation
Even more expensive than PASW student version
Not a true programming language
Not user friendly compared to other packages
Cost
Summary: Of the standard popular packages one comes across, it has more to offer than most, though not very user-friendly.  It appears to offer more modern academic computing than e.g. PASW and is widely used across many disciplines.
STATA Essentially a stat package geared specifically to the social scientist
Very strong on Generalized Linear Models and Time Series analysis
Straightforward programming language
User add-ons easy to implement
Has its own journal
Not so easy on the eyes for most people (unless you miss DOS)
Cost
Summary: A nice package, particularly for the political science, economics crowd, where its offerings are quite advanced.  Patrick's chosen package.

S-Plus

Gui implementation of the S-language while retaining all the power of that language Less flexible than its R counterpart
Cost
Summary:  For the academic crowd, it doesn't really offer anything R doesn't except with an easy to use gui out of the box.  If you're willing to pay for that and not have access to the multitude of packages in R, feel free.   For academics the S-language offers more than the others available in our opinion.


Computer Center Home | ACS | Help Desk | Training
About Us | Publications | Our Mission

Questions, comments and corrections for this site: Rich Herrington Richard.Herrington@unt.edu, Patrick McLeod Patrick.Mcleod@unt.edu, Mike Clark Michael.Clark@unt.edu.

Last updated: 04/15/09 by Rich Herrington.

UNT home page | Search UNT | UNT news | UNT events